<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>customerservant.com &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://customerservant.com/tag/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://customerservant.com</link>
	<description>Definitely Not Good for the Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Neuclear Disarmament The Latest Sacred Cow For Evangelical Christians?</title>
		<link>http://customerservant.com/2009/10/19/neuclear-disarmament-the-latest-sacred-cow-for-evangelical-christians/</link>
		<comments>http://customerservant.com/2009/10/19/neuclear-disarmament-the-latest-sacred-cow-for-evangelical-christians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armageddon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idolatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customerservant.com/?p=2253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one definitely raises eyebrows. In a dramatic about-face for a movement that a generation ago embraced a Cold War nuclear shield against the Soviets, evangelical Christians are now
spreading the gospel of nuclear disarmament. Once again, politics is the new religion. Christianity is just the outer garment, so to speak. I suppose I could give [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one definitely raises eyebrows. In a dramatic about-face for a movement that a generation ago embraced a Cold War nuclear shield against the Soviets, evangelical Christians are now<br />
<a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/news/2009/10/anti-nuke-campaign-suddenly-en.php">spreading the gospel</a> of nuclear disarmament. Once again, politics is the new religion. Christianity is just the outer garment, so to speak. I suppose I could give these Christian leaders the benefit of the doubt, and assume that they&#8217;ve seen the error of their ways and so they now realize that it might not be such a good idea to pray for the world to be on the brink of man-induced destruction, but somehow I doubt that such a sign of good faith is warranted. After all, according to some of these people, Jesus likes to micro-manage, and wouldn&#8217;t take too kindly to the Iranians stealing his thunder by laying waste to Jerusalem and the Jews who haven&#8217;t converted to their flavor of Christianity before Armageddon gets started. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://customerservant.com/2009/10/19/neuclear-disarmament-the-latest-sacred-cow-for-evangelical-christians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pledge of Confusion? Schools Wrestle With Flag Policy</title>
		<link>http://customerservant.com/2009/09/15/pledge-of-confusion-schools-wrestle-with-flag-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://customerservant.com/2009/09/15/pledge-of-confusion-schools-wrestle-with-flag-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idolatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customerservant.com/?p=2210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It&#8217;s a new school year, but an old fight is brewing in American classrooms. Teachers and administrators around the country are scratching their heads once again over the Pledge of Allegiance.
The courts have consistently ruled that students have the right not to recite the pledge in public schools. But now some First Amendment advocates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It&#8217;s a new school year, but an old fight is brewing in American classrooms. Teachers and administrators around the country are scratching their heads once again over the Pledge of Allegiance.</p>
<p>The courts have consistently ruled that students have the right not to recite the pledge in public schools. But now some First Amendment advocates are arguing that the law compels educators to inform kids at the beginning of school that the decision is hat the decision is entirely up to them as to whether or not they wish to recite the pledge. The original article doesn&#8217;t bring this up, but while some students have political concerns, there are others who have religious concerns, including Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses. Also, I think, but am not able to find any information on it, that reciting the pledge presents halachic (Jewish legal) issues, and possibly also Muslim legal issues as well. Given all this, I don&#8217;t see a problem with letting students and their parents know that reciting the pledge is optional, and I certainly don&#8217;t believe that any student should be humiliated for not reciting the pledge. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,550063,00.html">Read the whole thing</a> for the complete story. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://customerservant.com/2009/09/15/pledge-of-confusion-schools-wrestle-with-flag-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American People To Pres. Obama: No Plan, No Shutdown Of Gitmo</title>
		<link>http://customerservant.com/2009/06/07/american-people-to-pres-obama-no-plan-no-shutdown-of-gitmo/</link>
		<comments>http://customerservant.com/2009/06/07/american-people-to-pres-obama-no-plan-no-shutdown-of-gitmo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress Critters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father Obama knows best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customerservant.com/?p=2144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Planning to Plan Department: Just about everyone opposes President Obama&#8217;s planned closure of Gitmo, and even the members of his own party refused to grant the president the $80 million he asked for to close the facility, voting 90 to 6 to strip the requested funds from a war-spending bill. It&#8217;s pretty bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Planning to Plan Department: Just about everyone <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/New-poll-results-are-devastating-for-Obamas-Gitmo-plan-46734382.html">opposes</a> President Obama&#8217;s planned closure of Gitmo, and even the members of his own party <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/580axpmq.asp">refused</a> to grant the president the $80 million he asked for to close the facility, voting 90 to 6 to strip the requested funds from a war-spending bill. It&#8217;s pretty bad when even your allies desert you like that. Maybe this huge lack of support will convince the president to scrap this endeavor and move on to something else, perhaps something a bit more sensible. <a href="http://senseofevents.blogspot.com/2009/06/americans-say-dont-close-gitmo.html">(Via).</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://customerservant.com/2009/06/07/american-people-to-pres-obama-no-plan-no-shutdown-of-gitmo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama Declared A God, Sort Of</title>
		<link>http://customerservant.com/2009/06/07/president-obama-declared-a-god-sort-of/</link>
		<comments>http://customerservant.com/2009/06/07/president-obama-declared-a-god-sort-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idolatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customerservant.com/?p=2142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More of the idolatry which goes by the name of Americanism, this time from the left. On Friday, Newsweek&#8217;s editor, Evan Thomas, brought adulation over President Obama&#8217;s Cairo speech to a whole new level by declaring on MSNBC: &#8220;I mean in a way Obama&#8217;s standing above the country, above above the world, he&#8217;s sort of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of the idolatry which goes by the name of Americanism, this time from the left. On Friday, Newsweek&#8217;s editor, Evan Thomas, brought adulation over President Obama&#8217;s Cairo speech to a whole new level by declaring on MSNBC: &#8220;I mean in a way Obama&#8217;s standing above the country, above above the world, he&#8217;s sort of God.&#8221; And the really sad partt is that this sort of thing isn&#8217;t immediately declared sick. I&#8217;m still waiting for the President Obama holy cards and icons, and I hope that President Obama has enough sense to eschew this sort of worshipful praise. After all, he has an example to look to from his own scripture, in the story of Paul and Barnabas being declared Zeus and Hermes by the people of Lystra, (see <a href="http://net.bible.org/verse.php?book=act&chapter=14&verse=11" title="Read Acts 14:11-18 in the NET Bible(r)" rel="external">Acts 14:11-18</a>). I won&#8217;t hold my breath. <a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/06/newsweek-editor-obama-is-sort-of-gd.html">(Via).</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://customerservant.com/2009/06/07/president-obama-declared-a-god-sort-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rabbis Oppose Use Of Internet During Study  For Conversion</title>
		<link>http://customerservant.com/2009/05/21/rabbis-oppose-use-of-internet-during-study-for-conversion/</link>
		<comments>http://customerservant.com/2009/05/21/rabbis-oppose-use-of-internet-during-study-for-conversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beit Din]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seforim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customerservant.com/?p=2126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s another anti-tech alert. Why doesn&#8217;t this surprise me? 
Rabbinic Conversion Court judges are more likely to reject prospective converts who were partially trained via the Internet, a senior source in the Conversion Authority said Sunday.
According to the source, about 70% of prospective converts who are interviewed by the conversion court are accepted. However, among [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another anti-tech alert. Why doesn&#8217;t this surprise me? </p>
<blockquote><p>Rabbinic Conversion Court judges are more likely to reject prospective converts who were partially trained via the Internet, a senior source in the Conversion Authority said Sunday.<br />
According to the source, about 70% of prospective converts who are interviewed by the conversion court are accepted. However, among prospective converts who were trained in part via the Internet, only about half are accepted, said the source.<br />
The issue of conversions comes to the forefront ahead of Shavuot, which is celebrated with the reading of the biblical story of Ruth, the archetypical convert to Judaism.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to the above-referenced conversion court source, the court can tell the difference between people who study partially using the internet, and those who study using only books and a face-to-face teacher. I maintain, however, that this isn&#8217;t a matter of the internet producing lower-quality students, or the internet providing lower-quality material, but students either not utilizing it properly, or students finding alternative oppinions of rabbis who don&#8217;t necessarily hold like the rabbis sitting on the conversion panel, and thus these students are disqualified. During my conversion studies in 1999/2000, if it hadn&#8217;t been for the internet, I would have never gotten the information I needed. I devoured <a href="http://www.jewfaq.org">JewFaq,</a> and to this day I use it as a partial reference, along with <a href="http://www.torah.org">Project Genesis</a> and <a href="http://www.aish.com">Aish Hatorah</a> due to the almost complete inavailability of seforim in any sort of accessible format. And until this complete inavailability is changed, I&#8217;ll continue to do so, or I&#8217;ll have to buy print seforim and then scan them, correct the mistakes that creep in through OCR, and then, finally, read it. So in my eyes, this annti-tech decree strikes me as a luddite one at best.<br />
<a href="http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2009/05/rabbis-oppose-use-of-internet-for-conversion-classes.html">Hat-tip.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://customerservant.com/2009/05/21/rabbis-oppose-use-of-internet-during-study-for-conversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Right-wing Extremist Specimen: Tax protester in hot water over tea bags</title>
		<link>http://customerservant.com/2009/04/20/a-right-wing-extremist-specimen-tax-protester-in-hot-water-over-tea-bags/</link>
		<comments>http://customerservant.com/2009/04/20/a-right-wing-extremist-specimen-tax-protester-in-hot-water-over-tea-bags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father Obama knows best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rightwing extremists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customerservant.com/2009/04/20/a-right-wing-extremist-specimen-tax-protester-in-hot-water-over-tea-bags/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here, ladies and gentlemen, is a prime example of what constitutes one of those right-wing extremists the government was warning us about, &#8230; a little old lady who sent tea bag tabs to her elected representatives and the president. 
A Beeville grandmother who sent tea bag tabs to Washington and Austin earlier this month found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, ladies and gentlemen, is a prime example of what constitutes one of those right-wing extremists the government was warning us about, &#8230; a little old lady who sent tea bag tabs to her elected representatives and the president. </p>
<p><blockqquote>A Beeville grandmother who sent tea bag tabs to Washington and Austin earlier this month found herself at police headquarters Monday answering questions about her intentions.</p>
<p>“I’m just a normal person. I’m a single grandmother raising two granddaughters,” said Faye Freeman Tuesday morning.</p>
<p>So imagine her reaction when Texas Ranger Andy Lopez and Beeville Police Department Staff Sgt. Richard Cantu came to her door Monday and told her they wanted her to go to the police department for questioning.</p>
<p>The reason? Freeman had mailed the tags from 64 tea bags to different elected representatives in Austin and Washington on April 4 to protest government spending. And one of the recipients had called the authorities to report her, saying he or she had received something suspicious in the mail from a woman in Beeville.</p>
<p>“If you were on the receiving end of something like that, what would you think?” Freeman said Lopez asked her.</p>
<p>“If I’d got something like that, I would have called the person back and said, ‘Can I help you?’” was her response.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now now, we can&#8217;t have common sense entering into this discussion. It&#8217;s just not proper for the common folk to criticize our benevolent government. They plant fear in the hearts of our harried political overlords, and that&#8217;s just a horrible thing to do. </p>
<blockquote><p>Freeman was doing what thousands of working taxpayers are doing this month as part of a protest against increased government spending and coming tax increases.</p>
<p>Instead of sending tea bags, the grandmother decided to send the tabs from the bags and use the tea herself.</p>
<p>When she was asked why it was that she did not include a note in the letter explaining why she was sending the tabs, she had a simple answer. “That would have been an awful lot of writing.”</p>
<p>Freeman sent the envelopes to everyone in Washington and Austin she thought might listen. That included President Barack Obama, her U.S. senators and a number of representatives, state senators and representatives.</p>
<p>“When you do something like this you want to cover the chain of command,” she said.</p>
<p>But she never expected lawmen to show up at her door asking her to go downtown.</p>
<p>“I’m really surprised it happened,” Freeman said. “You should have seen my neighbors. I’m just a normal person and when the Texas Rangers came looking for me, they said, ‘Oh my goodness, what’s going on?’”</p>
<p>“I was stunned to start with,” Freeman said. “I didn’t have any idea. They kept assuring me that I wouldn’t be arrested.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Your tax dollars at work fellow citizens, sending the cops after little old ladies. Absolutely pathetic. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.mysoutex.com/printer_friendly/2321290">source,</a> <a href="http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/04/heres-your-1st-rightwing-extremist.html">via.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://customerservant.com/2009/04/20/a-right-wing-extremist-specimen-tax-protester-in-hot-water-over-tea-bags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
